Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Memory 13.1 1-Core 37.2 2-Core 42.1 18% 30.8 Pts	4-Core 71.9 8-Core 74.8 10% 73.4 Pts	64-Core 64.9 4% 64.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 30%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Blackpcs SSDPro 240GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0729A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 7.5 8.1 11 17 241 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 285 Write 174 Mixed 294 SusWrite 47.7 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 12.8 64% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 28.6 46% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3170NE68F9F1600 1x4GB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 2.7 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 376 11% 376 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	45x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	39x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	11x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	30x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	25x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	21x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	41x
RMT3170NE68F9F1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 18%, 710 samples	22x
HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 21%, 6,087 samples	7x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16