HP EliteBook 840 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828C
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 17:31
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46% Average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 84.9
47% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 139
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 828C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 4.7
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 122 121 131 126 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 423
Write 208
Mixed 314
SusWrite 132
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 18.2
64% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 140
126% 188 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 19.5
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 16.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 0 0 60 14" 1280 720 LGD04F3
Typical EliteBook 840 G4 Builds (Compare 1,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback