Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 16:26
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 248
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 825
79% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,272
79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 148
Parallax 136
109% 139 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 138
Splatting 124
104% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1774 1825 1299 1231 1235 1236 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,660
Write 2408
Mixed 2,077
SusWrite 1,433
481% 2,144 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 62.1
218% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 781
567% 744 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 293%
Great: 537%
Intel SSDMCEAC090B3 90GB
20GB free
Firmware: LLLi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 107 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 419
Write 124
Mixed 174
SusWrite 108
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 32.6
120% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 153
118% 162 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 65%
Micron_M550_MTFDDAT064MAY 64GB
2GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 200
Mixed 238
65% 296 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 33
115% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 164
137% 199 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
48GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 109 106 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 76.3
Write 67
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 107
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 23.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 SKG2402 H24T09P
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback