Simply LLM2v5CYF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSimply LLM2v5CYF  (all builds)
MotherboardSAPPHIRE BP-FP6-SN
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 08:40
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 233
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 535
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.25% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 12.6
7% 11.8 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 14.9
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.25%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,400
Write 2,148
Mixed 1,425
442% 1,991 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 69.3
218% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 883
629% 812 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5711-014.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.3% Very good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 24.2
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 19.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 47 60 15.5" 1280 720 GEC0016 Onlap1503
Typical LLM2v5CYF Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Simply LLM2v5CYF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback