Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T1600
MotherboardDell Precision T1600  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 22:48
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 139
61% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 235
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 60.5
50% 63.1 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 54.1
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 960GB
853GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA1a.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 329 355 401 411 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 255
Write 102
Mixed 282
SusWrite 358
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 29.7
103% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 239
198% 283 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
261GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 106 106 111 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 106
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 70%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
211GB free
Firmware: GM4OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 83 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 73.1
Write 75.9
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 83
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
466GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 118 119 126 126 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 113
Write 109
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 119
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 33 60 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2450 2450W
Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback