| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming (all builds) |
| Memory | 55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171031 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 05 '23 at 20:13 |
| Run Duration | 184 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
82.6%
Excellent
|
83% 151 Pts
|
69% 535 Pts
|
39% 629 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.3%
Below average
|
31% 40.4 fps
|
28% 35.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
226% 1,036 MB/s
|
156% 57.4 MB/s
|
517% 780 MB/s
| |
|
|
102% 138 MB/s
|
143% 1.03 MB/s
| ||
|
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
7% 6.63 MB/s
|
3% 0.23 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
63.1%
Good
|
64% 22.4 GB/s
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
48% 83.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 68 | 54 | 165 | 27" | 1280 720 | AUS270E VG279QR |
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,034 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700KIntel $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,430x |
| Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 673x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 271x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 366x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 316x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 227x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $637 |