MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 19:57
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 167
2-Core 335
103% 194 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,069
106% 865 Pts
64-Core 1,462
90% 1,462 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 247
Parallax 306
225% 277 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 237
Splatting 173
190% 242 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 191%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 400 405 423 404 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 458
Mixed 390
SusWrite 409
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 40.2
142% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 222
163% 211 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 115%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1730 1863 1953 1951 1961 1946 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,397
Write 1,977
Mixed 2,105
SusWrite 1,900
471% 2,095 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 57.7
208% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 184
254% 499 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 305%
Great: 435%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
466GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 112 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 121
Write 113
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 114
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 69%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 159 159 165 168 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 162
Mixed 103
SusWrite 163
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
184GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 107 110 113 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 107
Write 103
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 110
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 173 176 183 186 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 176
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 181
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
535GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 125 127 129 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 141
Mixed 98.6
SusWrite 127
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.7% Very good
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 31.2
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 32.5
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F1C BenQ RL2455
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $684
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback