Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime43.8 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 10:34
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 93
2-Core 185
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 313
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.23 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 9.3
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,730
Write 1,414
Mixed 1,443
340% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 51.9
174% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 507
DQ Mixed 617
456% 605 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Xraydisk 1TB SSD 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 0301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 205 287 269 324 332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 326
Write 296
Mixed 270
SusWrite 273
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 8.4
53% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 13.6
40% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
301GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 115 115 117 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 69.1
Write 130
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 113
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 859B CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 50 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback