MSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D48
MotherboardMSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230110
Uptime14.7 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 10:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 76.7
1-Core 172
2-Core 296
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 794
84% 672 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 176
Parallax 165
149% 175 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 136
Splatting 118
117% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1844 1926 313 224 392 377 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,572
Write 1,613
Mixed 1,703
SusWrite 846
323% 1,434 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 75.6
252% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,311
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1,130
852% 1146 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 244%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R9S416G3206U2K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 28.9
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 21.5
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 29 216 60 60 23.8" 1920 1080 MSI3BA9 MSI MP241X
Typical PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48) Builds (Compare 2,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback