Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 760GM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180511
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '23 at 10:14
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 53.6 2-Core 83 46% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 152 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3657) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 21.8 Parallax 24 15% 21.3 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 23.5 Splatting 20.1 19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Saichi K300 SSD 120G 120GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R024Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 190 190 204 155 166 MB/s Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.4% Average	Read 210 Write 187 Mixed 190 SusWrite 179 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 21.6 76% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 145 104% 131 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 83%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 51GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 67 68 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 73.8 Write 67 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 68.7 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 12.9 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	52	23	60	19.5"	1280 720	HPN3631 HP P204

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	122x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	63x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	46x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	38x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	48x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	15x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16