Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T1600
MotherboardDell Precision T1600  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 09:37
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 147
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 238
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 68
Parallax 60.6
50% 63.3 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 54
50% 61.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 960GB
469GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA1a.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 353 361 397 403 394 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 160
Write 98.1
Mixed 307
SusWrite 360
53% 231 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 29.2
105% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 231
193% 277 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74%
Great: 103%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
285GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 138 137 141 143 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 169
Write 164
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 138
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88%
Great: 184%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
346GB free
Firmware: GM4OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 74.8
Write 75.8
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 83.1
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 7 60 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2450 2450W
Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback