IRU 525

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIRU 525  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B450M-HDV R4.0
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 22:05
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 278
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 817
77% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,109
69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 93.5
Reflection 129
Parallax 78.1
76% 100 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 79.3
Splatting 72.3
60% 72.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 419 287 154 154 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 508
Write 444
Mixed 407
SusWrite 288
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 2.8
72% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 28.5
84% 173 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
378GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 130 130 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 130
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 33.4
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 33.5
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27B2
Typical 525 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: IRU 525

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback