Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 21:10
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 817
78% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL7 1TB
504GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1033 2153 1829 1823 1812 1820 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2684
Write 2,752
Mixed 2,665
SusWrite 1,745
554% 2,462 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 81
263% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,013
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 684
528% 735 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 330%
Great: 454%
Seagate Expansion HDD 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1801
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 165
Mixed 119
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
418% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN KF3200C16D4/8GX Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 30.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 31.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 0" 2560 1369
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback