Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora Ryzen Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0TYR0X
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 03:38
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 170
2-Core 338
107% 200 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 996
102% 822 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
MSI(1462 3985) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 139
Parallax 300
121% 196 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 153
Splatting 207
168% 207 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SWORDFISH 500GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1160 600 238 74 77 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 1,091
Mixed 842
SusWrite 373
206% 926 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 44.6
174% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 483
390% 535 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 157%
Great: 256%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$55
110GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,574
Write 2252
Mixed 1,604
476% 2,143 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 92.1
316% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 1,259
DQ Mixed 1,166
871% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
306GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 106 103 104 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 102
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 104
62% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
142GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 161 151 145 162 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 108
Write 113
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 159
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.5
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 34.7
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 31.5" 1280 720 DELD112 DELL S3222HG
Typical Aurora Ryzen Edition Builds (Compare 888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback