PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Hp-pavilion WC833AA-AB9 p6310pt (all builds) |
Motherboard | MSI IONA |
Memory | 5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100128 |
Uptime | 3.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 04 '23 at 16:51 |
Run Duration | 201 Seconds |
Run User | SVN-User |
Background CPU | 68% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
39%
Below average
|
29% 44.4 Pts
|
24% 181 Pts
|
11% 183 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.1%
Below average
|
39% 50.3 fps
|
30% 38.2 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 139 28 19 22 18 MB/s
|
79.1%
Very good
|
110% 148 MB/s
|
1,312% 8.37 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
144GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 90 90 89 88 MB/s
|
49.5%
Average
|
58% 79.3 MB/s
|
173% 1.23 MB/s
|
|
![]() Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
433GB free
Firmware: JU001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 105 104 108 106 MB/s
|
69.3%
Good
|
75% 103 MB/s
|
223% 2.47 MB/s
|
|
![]() General UDisk 134GB
12GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 MB/s
|
4.65%
Terrible
|
8% 7.4 MB/s
|
19% 1.73 MB/s
|
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 36 | 16 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | AUS27D2 ASUS VA27EHE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 3x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 1x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Green 240GB (2018)WD $58Bench 45%, 156,194 samples | 1x |
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $48Bench 101%, 14,082 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $628 |