Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E5510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E5510  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2D6
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210226
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 14:45
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 173
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 222
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E26 003E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 5.4
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 7.5
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1016 256GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1193
Write 880
Mixed 872
218% 982 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 56.4
192% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 454
367% 519 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 181%
USB Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13
Write 3.2
Mixed 5
7% 7.07 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DB
Typical LIFEBOOK E5510 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E5510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback