Asus PRIME H410M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H410M-A (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200727
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '23 at 10:26
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 235 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 728 72% 590 Pts	64-Core 906 56% 906 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.4% Very good	Lighting 94.8 Reflection 102 Parallax 95.7 77% 97.4 fps	MRender 89.6 Gravity 92.7 Splatting 91.5 75% 91.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 836 640 651 643 604 485 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	209% Outstanding	Read 1,399 Write 1,252 Mixed 1,141 SusWrite 643 248% 1,109 MB/s	4K Read 57 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 74.5 247% 84.7 MB/s	DQ Read 987 DQ Write 686 DQ Mixed 821 617% 832 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 209% Great: 340%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 320GB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 4GB free, PID 6298 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 101 Write 18.4 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 42.4 53% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1Z3200C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 16GB 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.6% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 21.1 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 21.7 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	50	14	144	24.1"	1920 1017	SAM0F91 LC24RG50

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H410M-A Builds (Compare 1,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-A

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	602x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	339x
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	268x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	146x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	133x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	67x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	66x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	61x

RAM
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	46x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	41x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16