TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 02:37
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 205
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 400
49% 376 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 73.3%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.5% Above average
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 75
Parallax 66.8
62% 72.8 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 58.8
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 58.5%
 Great: 65%
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.78%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1114 256GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 741
Write 762
Mixed 764
169% 755 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 38.4
132% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 496
384% 529 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 177%
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GB
27GB free
Firmware: 11.9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 536
Write 608
Mixed 607
131% 584 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 27.2
87% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 531
383% 503 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.3% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 62.3%
 Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 0P 4R 5G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 24% 98 199 51 60 24.1" 1920 1009 ACR085B QG241Y P
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 15,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples12,314x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples3,624x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples42x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples8,432x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples1,610x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,539x
SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples2,470x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBWDCBench 167%, 6,790 samples2,166x
WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GBNvmeBench 156%, 3,698 samples1,651x
RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples2,338x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples1,707x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples1,628x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback