HP Compaq Pro 4300 AiO 20 PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 4300 AiO 20 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 18DD
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120521
Uptime49 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 17:03
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 33.5
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 69.8
26% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 165
18% 142 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 39 33 32 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 24.8
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 34
20% 26.7 MB/s
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 480
8% 480 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 3 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Compaq Pro 4300 AiO 20 PC Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 4300 AiO 20 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback