Asus PRIME Z370M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 14:45
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 597
71% 549 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 193
Parallax 179
140% 181 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 184
Splatting 130
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 256GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 247 347 271 283 254 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 332
Mixed 281
SusWrite 284
77% 347 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 40.7
141% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 162
164% 267 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 202 204 199 200 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 162
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 201
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 128GB
71GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 42 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68% Good
Read 49.9
Write 41.5
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 42.3
58% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 15
1,097% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 20.9
DQ Mixed 16.1
1,310% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 68%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 46 60 22" 1680 987 LEN60CC LEN T2254pC
Typical PRIME Z370M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback