Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	66% Good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 168 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 288 37% 278 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 200D) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.87 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 60GB 2,582 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 58 58 62 61 63 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46% Average	Read 241 Write 64.8 Mixed 108 SusWrite 60.5 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 26.2 94% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 63 DQ Mixed 79.5 60% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-008.A00LF 2x4GB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.2% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13.7 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	40	22	60	19"	1280 720	VSC211C VA902b

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16