Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M K V2  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 23:12
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 650
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$234
Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 111
Parallax 114
95% 114 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 102
Splatting 94
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
931GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1952 1977 2014 2010 1981 1979 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 1,696
Write 2150
Mixed 1,841
SusWrite 1,985
434% 1,918 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 68.5
220% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 648
DQ Mixed 807
599% 799 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 293%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 29.2
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 21% 28 216 59 144 23.5" 1280 720 VSC0437 VX2458 series
Typical GA-A520M K V2 Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback