Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive406% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 22:58
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 307
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 889
89% 726 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
MSI(1462 3980) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 135
Parallax 293
117% 191 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 152
Splatting 207
162% 198 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$137
726GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3279 3356 2848 1245 1283 1237 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 3,822
Write 3,496
Mixed 2,522
SusWrite 2,208
675% 3,012 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 70.6
228% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1267
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 1,114
814% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 406%
Great: 537%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
273GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 314 298 369 158 237 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 489
Mixed 333
SusWrite 286
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 36.5
140% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 171
170% 273 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 118%
WDS500G1XHE-00AFY0 500GB
387GB free
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2310 1671 977 779 795 807 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,556
Write 2,378
Mixed 2,138
SusWrite 1,223
465% 2,074 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 72.1
244% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 1552
DQ Write 1,362
DQ Mixed 1,433
1,081% 1,449 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 317%
Great: 516%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 113 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 104
Write 96.4
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 112
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$67
485GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 178 179 180 179 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 149
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 177
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.2
395% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
977GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 99 100 100 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 93.7
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 99.2
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZR 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.4
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.3
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 BNQ7F2B BenQ XL2720Z
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback