Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '18 at 02:46
Run Duration414 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 195
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 521
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0122) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.92
Parallax 1.66
2% 2.69 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 1.37
Splatting 4.61
3% 3.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 107
Parallax 89.3
80% 98.1 fps
MRender 89.3
Gravity 88.8
Splatting 92.6
74% 90.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 378
Write 306
Mixed 310
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 28.9
105% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 72.9
82% 141 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 134%
LaCie Hard Drive 1TB
74GB free, PID 1016
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 28.9
Mixed 12.1
29% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.37
61% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 21%
WDC WD20 03FYPS-27W9B0 2TB
72GB free, PID 2351
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.9% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 38.5
Mixed 10.2
34% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
21GB free, PID 2351
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.4% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 38.6
Mixed 35.9
48% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.36
77% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 22%
TDK LoR TF10 8GB
6GB free, PID 0710
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 4.9
Mixed 6.93
10% 8.87 MB/s
4K Read 4.45
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.009
17% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback