Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 12:17
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 643
61% 504 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 82.8
Reflection 126
Parallax 160
68% 123 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 87
Splatting 150
115% 141 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 38 37 33 6.8 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 406
Write 192
Mixed 314
SusWrite 47.3
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 27.1
113% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 11.1
66% 153 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
64GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 22 21 22 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
118GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 77 81 84 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 103
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 80.6
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 60%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 60 500GB
116GB free
Firmware: JJ2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 110 108 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 56.6
Write 68.4
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 110
48% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30CESTK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 13.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 4 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0D9 DELL P2419H
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $442
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback