Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605PA_X1605PA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605PA_X1605PA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1605PA
Memory12.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230412
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 10:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 66
1-Core 152
2-Core 251
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 585
64% 504 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1353) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3251
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 27.2
19% 25.7 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 30.9
Splatting 19.4
19% 23.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW010T8 1TB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 286 119 197 132 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 978
Write 957
Mixed 778
SusWrite 277
167% 748 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 56.7
195% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 621
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 469
345% 462 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 137%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 6 60 16" 1536 889 AUO459D
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605PA_X1605PA Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605PA_X1605PA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback