PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV (all builds) |
Memory | 0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170727 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 02 '23 at 06:26 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | HRV-User |
Background CPU | 58% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31220 @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
61.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 106 91 72 89 88 MB/s
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
79GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.3 5.7 6.9 9.8 5.7 MB/s
|
1.95%
Terrible
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
64GB free
Firmware: 16.01H16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 89 86 87 89 MB/s
|
47.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2133C11 Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
43.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 33 | 14 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | HPN3469 HP E243 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 208x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 176x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 108x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 162x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 133x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 87x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $186 |