Supermicro X10SRA-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X10SRA-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SRA-F
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 03:18
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 177
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 418
40% 331 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 67.1
57% 69.8 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 65.1
55% 67 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 352 360 328 253 268 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 414
Write 272
Mixed 389
SusWrite 304
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 34.7
125% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 134
132% 212 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.7% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 17.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 47 60 18.9" 1280 720 ACI19EA VE198
Typical X10SRA-F Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X10SRA-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback