PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro X10SRA-F (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X10SRA-F |
Memory | 59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160623 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 02 '23 at 02:52 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 84% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 187 245 232 235 230 MB/s
|
45.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 115 | 25 | 60 | 18.9" | 1280 720 | ACI19EA VE198 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 6x |
Xeon E5-2620 v4IntelBench 68%, 1,471 samples | 4x |
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 2x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $299 |