MSI MS-17S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive514% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Raider GE78HX SmartTP 13VG
MotherboardMSI MS-17S2  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 20:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 221
2-Core 426
125% 243 Pts
4-Core 809
8-Core 1510
138% 1,159 Pts
64-Core 3,382
209% 3,382 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 182
Parallax 203
176% 201 fps
MRender 284
Gravity 173
Splatting 122
149% 193 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 154%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA2T0TFH 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3337 3790 3765 3784 3790 2080 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
514% Outstanding
Read 3,688
Write 3,868
Mixed 2,832
SusWrite 3,424
778% 3,453 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 93.1
309% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,599
DQ Write 1,171
DQ Mixed 1,356
1,021% 1,375 MB/s
Poor: 231%
This bench: 514%
Great: 559%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
181% Outstanding
MC Read 75.6
MC Write 69.5
MC Mixed 67.2
202% 70.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 52.5
SC Mixed 31.7
103% 36.1 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 181%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 17" 1280 720 AUO84A6
Typical MS-17S2 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback