HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8265
Memory	4.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '23 at 19:22
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A10-8770 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 556 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 47 1-Core 63.7 2-Core 120 44% 76.9 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 168 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 39.8 Parallax 37.9 30% 38.1 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 38 Splatting 26.7 27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Emtec X250 256GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 36 31 35 46 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 427 Write 308 Mixed 318 SusWrite 40.7 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 13.5 77% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 1.4 40% 97.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: HP74 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 125 123 127 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 123 Write 78.2 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 126 72% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905622-057.A00G Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB - [0x9B85] CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.1% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	21.5"	1280 720	SAM08D4 S22B350

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 SFF

CPU
PRO A10-8770 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 42%, 556 samples	46x
PRO A10-9700 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 45%, 452 samples	31x
PRO A8-9600 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 44%, 209 samples	28x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	122x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	29x
Radeon R7 430AMDBench 6%, 939 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	3x
Array 1 511GBAmd-raidBench 155%, 791 samples	3x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	18x
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	11x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16