Komplett PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemKomplett PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 16:41
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 1,022
94% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.5% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 110
Parallax 102
84% 105 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 100
Splatting 98.3
80% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRSK1000G 1TB
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 2107 2194 2176 2273 2217 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 1,953
Write 2,153
Mixed 2,012
SusWrite 2,040
461% 2,040 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 85.4
285% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,580
DQ Write 1260
DQ Mixed 1,385
1,046% 1,408 MB/s
Poor: 263%
This bench: 354%
Great: 590%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8ME-16XR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 29.1
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 29.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA8 MSI G273Q
Typical PC Builds (Compare 3,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Komplett PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $660
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback