Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '18 at 22:37
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 794
72% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,159
72% 1,159 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 154
Parallax 131
111% 140 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 114
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 358GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 1,269
Write 373
Mixed 479
154% 707 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 11.6
84% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 12
47% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 104%
Great: 154%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 840 256GB
38GB free
Firmware: DXM0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 502
Write 423
Mixed 424
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 21.7
106% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 65
89% 162 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 90%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EACS-00D 1TB
6GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 58
Write 44
Mixed 46.2
37% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.26
76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 32.5
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 27.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback