MSI B460M BOMBER (MS-7C88)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C88
MotherboardMSI B460M BOMBER (MS-7C88)  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 11:53
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 749
73% 601 Pts
64-Core 959
59% 959 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 190
Parallax 188
146% 186 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 186
Splatting 124
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 718 443 377 384 447 347 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 388
Write 1,241
Mixed 556
SusWrite 453
151% 659 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 40.3
156% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 805
598% 795 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 126%
Great: 240%
Hgst HUS726T4TALE6L4 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: VKGAW41G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 200 202 198 202 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 226
Write 228
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 200
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 2
9% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 27%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
68GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 194 198 192 195 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 138
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 194
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 113%
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB
132GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 94 97 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 97.5
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 96.1
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 0P 4R 1G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 31% 55 191 10 144 26.9" 2560 1417 LHCFFFF 27G1
Typical B460M BOMBER (MS-7C88) Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI B460M BOMBER (MS-7C88)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback