Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 205% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 205% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '23 at 00:22
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$292 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 95.5 1-Core 142 2-Core 284 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 560 8-Core 1,088 98% 824 Pts	64-Core 1,438 89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550 45,585 User benchmarks, average bench 190% Gigabyte(1458 40E6) CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	209% Outstanding	Lighting 302 Reflection 275 Parallax 295 246% 291 fps	MRender 375 Gravity 251 Splatting 196 215% 274 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 209% Great: 205%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 613GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 892 1023 1224 1215 1156 1188 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 972 Write 1,483 Mixed 572 SusWrite 1,116 234% 1,036 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 59.3 195% 71 MB/s	DQ Read 1,232 DQ Write 917 DQ Mixed 1,019 777% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 302%
Ts512gmt S800 512GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 385GB free Firmware: 0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 335 406 407 407 406 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 375 Write 371 Mixed 296 SusWrite 365 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 23.4 75% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 100 77% 104 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 366 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 29.2 102% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 44.5 SC Mixed 29.8 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 53.9 74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27.5"	1280 720	SAM0C4D U28E590

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	891x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	551x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	475x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	288x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	245x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	206x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	134x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $564

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16