Asrock B550M Pro SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 285%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 277%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics275% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B550M Pro SE  (all builds)
Memory40.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 23:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 325
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1,102
105% 870 Pts
64-Core 1,471
91% 1,471 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3B) ≥ 4GB; Asus
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
275% Outstanding
Lighting 365
Reflection 466
Parallax 788
298% 540 fps
MRender 514
Gravity 302
Splatting 480
357% 432 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 275%
Great: 293%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7001T 1TB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 282 18 173 340 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 479
Write 412
Mixed 375
SusWrite 210
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 25.4
131% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 36.8
86% 172 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL18-22-22 D4-3600 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 CL18-22-22 D4-3600 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 37.6
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 39.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 37
108% 37 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 31.5" 1920 1009 HPN3719 HP M32f FHD
Typical B550M Pro SE Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Pro SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback