Asus G73Jw

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G73Jw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 23:41
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 91.4
46% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 72.2
8-Core 102
11% 87.3 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2042) 1.5GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.57
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 207 203 205 207 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42% Average
Read 215
Write 166
Mixed 198
SusWrite 206
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 15.3
50% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 122
90% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42%
Great: 102%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
466GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 99 98 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 81.9
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 98.8
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 34 60 17.3" 1920 1017 HSD06A5 HSD173PUW1
Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback