Asus G73Jw

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G73Jw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 23:29
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 93.1
1-Core 57
2-Core 90.7
54% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 206
22% 174 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2042) 1.5GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.57
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 205 201 202 202 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.5% Average
Read 116
Write 63.7
Mixed 162
SusWrite 203
31% 136 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 16.1
63% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 136
110% 155 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
466GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 95 99 88 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 96.1
Write 90.8
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 94.5
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 11 60 17.3" 1280 720 HSD06A5 HSD173PUW1
Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback