Gigabyte GA-Sabre 17WV8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Sabre 17WV8  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 17:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 224
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 573
62% 490 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.1 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.56%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 60
Reflection 105
Parallax 62.8
49% 75.8 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 63.1
52% 64 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend MTE820 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CB1.1.A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 187 106 107 63 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 726
Write 862
Mixed 642
SusWrite 222
138% 613 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 37.8
125% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 310
245% 334 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97%
Great: 120%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
497GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 119 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 113
Write 102
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 118
64% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1747
Typical GA-Sabre 17WV8 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Sabre 17WV8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback