Asrock 870 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 870 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '23 at 17:16
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 78.6 1-Core 54.3 2-Core 108 51% 80.3 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 181 23% 176 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 3001) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Lighting 51.6 Reflection 40 Parallax 67.4 42% 53 fps	MRender 35.3 Gravity 55.5 Splatting 27.8 31% 39.5 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 128GB 1,375 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 125 31 40 68 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 448 Write 350 Mixed 371 SusWrite 86.3 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 23.5 82% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 41.1 66% 125 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 337GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 111 111 113 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 107 Write 101 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 110 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB 430 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 533, 200, 533, 200 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.8% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.9 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 95.4 42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	47	60	21.6"	1280 720	PHLC07B 227ELH

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	15x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	4x
Radeon HD 7350AMDBench 1%, 193 samples	3x
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
Q300 120GBToshibaBench 70%, 1,888 samples	2x

RAM
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 4GBUnknownBench 31%, 4 samples	2x
99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 6GBKingstonBench 50%, 4 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 42%, 629 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $111

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16