Medion NP50PNP-M/NP60PNP-M/NP70PNPM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion NP50PNP-M/NP60PNP-M/NP70PNPM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NP50PNP-M/NP60PNP-M/NP70PNPM
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 14:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 66.9
1-Core 183
2-Core 318
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 896
89% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,227
76% 1,227 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1E39 A03B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 6.5
4% 6.07 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 4.8
5% 6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 2200S NVMe 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22001030 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 972 956 979 984 987 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,396
Write 985
Mixed 958
SusWrite 925
239% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 49.9
165% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 785
590% 789 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 199%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 30.9
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 23.7
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback