Medion H81H3-EM2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion H81H3-EM2  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 13:53
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 308
39% 296 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.9% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 33.6
27% 34.2 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 0.3
17% 23.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4130012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 107 99 103 97 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 243
Write 230
Mixed 206
SusWrite 107
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 27.2
92% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 176
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 90%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
383GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 385 422 423 419 371 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 450
Mixed 426
SusWrite 395
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 51.5
164% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 110%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 5R 8G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 18% 123 342 60 60 27" 1280 720 SAM7079 LC27G5xT
Typical H81H3-EM2 Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Medion H81H3-EM2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback