Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 127% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 7 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220608
Uptime	11 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '23 at 11:49
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 90.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 618 70% 548 Pts	64-Core 619 38% 619 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404C) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 216 Reflection 209 Parallax 190 176% 205 fps	MRender 199 Gravity 151 Splatting 137 130% 162 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$90 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 611GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 459 465 462 462 465 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 460 Mixed 330 SusWrite 457 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 41 144% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 289 234% 332 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 137%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 3,626 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 685GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 41 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 37.3 Write 39.7 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 39.7 50% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.5 115% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBD 1x16GB 551 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	24"	1920 1017	BNQ78CE BenQ GL2460

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,640x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,000x
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	948x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	689x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	556x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	362x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	306x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	175x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	144x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	193x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	190x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	161x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $355

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16