Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210331
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 02:09
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$281
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 305
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 1,139
104% 872 Pts
64-Core 1,602
99% 1,602 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 182
Parallax 183
145% 181 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 159
Splatting 133
131% 164 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
557GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 908 498 501 271 726 500 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
357GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1870 1859 1791 1843 1845 1823 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,764
Write 1,824
Mixed 1,722
SusWrite 1,838
404% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 54
169% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 994
745% 995 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 280%
Great: 488%
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2114 2113 2072 1759 1608 1634 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,060
Write 1,898
Mixed 1,793
SusWrite 1,883
430% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 48.2
198% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1229
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 1,136
846% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 307%
Great: 595%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
7.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 191 190 197 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 494GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 57.4
Mixed 61.5
90% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.2
110% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 04CB DDR4 3000 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 28.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 29.6
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 49
82% 49 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 33 240 24.5" 1280 720 DELA103 DELL AW2518HF
Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $799
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback