Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus B75M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130922
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 00:10
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 166
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 291
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 19.6
12% 19.8 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 20
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE220400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 344
Write 268
Mixed 226
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 10.5
49% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 11.8
34% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
78GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 102 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 85.1
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 101
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 17 75 24" 1280 720 HGC2400 X24
Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback