HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 14:02
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2314
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 157
51% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 239
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 228GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 168
Write 161
Mixed 143
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 7.7
1,322% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 173%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
5GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.4
Write 4.5
Mixed 9.2
10% 9.03 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
36% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 4 60 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback