Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 135%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive416% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230911
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 09:19
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 236
2-Core 477
138% 268 Pts
4-Core 951
8-Core 1,717
160% 1,334 Pts
64-Core 3,964
245% 3,964 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5700
AMD(1002 031E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.6% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 195
Parallax 182
91% 163 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 124
Splatting 89.7
87% 108 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2834 947 963 956 970 967 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 2,742
Write 3,236
Mixed 2,936
SusWrite 1,273
574% 2,547 MB/s
4K Read 86.1
4K Write 265
4K Mixed 132
440% 161 MB/s
DQ Read 2328
DQ Write 1,810
DQ Mixed 2,044
1,536% 2,060 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 416%
Great: 442%
Samsung MZQLW960HMJP-00003 960GB
188GB free
Firmware: CXV8301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 968 965 960 960 983 985 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,492
Write 977
Mixed 640
SusWrite 970
227% 1,020 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 60.9
268% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,492
DQ Write 1,059
DQ Mixed 839
745% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 256%
Great: 248%
WD WD8003FFBX-68B9AN0 8TB
141GB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 119 119 120 125 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 123
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.6
378% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 139%
Seagate ST4000VX013-2XG104 4TB
310GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 63 60 69 73 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 24.2
Write 122
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 71.8
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
125% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 56%
WD WD8003FFBX-68B9AN0 8TB
1GB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 97.8
Mixed 86
72% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 1.3
379% 3.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 6.4
DQ Mixed 1.7
21% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 139%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 149 149 150 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 147
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 148
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GIGA-BYTE Co Ltd GP-ARS16G44 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
148% Outstanding
MC Read 57.5
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 53.2
158% 55.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 53.6
SC Mixed 37.8
112% 39.4 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 148%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5A45 23MP65
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 2,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,263
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback