Gigabyte GA-B560M DS3H V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M DS3H V2  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 03:37
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 145
2-Core 281
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 954
91% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,452
90% 1,452 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 84.1
76% 89.4 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 80.9
Splatting 73.7
71% 89.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 424
Write 409
Mixed 376
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 35.3
138% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 184
170% 257 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Kingbank KP330 120GB
24GB free
Firmware: V4.15.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 417
Mixed 351
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 22.4
118% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 29.6
72% 148 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-427.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 27.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 23" 1280 720 HWP3283 HP Z23n
Typical GA-B560M DS3H V2 Builds (Compare 5,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M DS3H V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback