MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory43.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221012
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 21:18
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 987
90% 754 Pts
64-Core 989
61% 989 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 114
Parallax 113
96% 115 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 94
Splatting 106
90% 110 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1012 985 951 902 849 774 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,249
Write 1,532
Mixed 1,134
SusWrite 912
324% 1,457 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 53.3
170% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1113
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 868
657% 892 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 239%
Great: 393%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
191GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1577 1573 1406 1335 1332 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,036
Write 1,756
Mixed 1,579
SusWrite 1,433
382% 1,701 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 64.6
206% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 1,007
761% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 280%
Great: 410%
WD WD141KRYZ-01C66B0 14TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 199 202 199 203 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 201
Mixed 122
SusWrite 202
134% 182 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 3.1
538% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 117%
Great: 137%
WD WD141KRYZ-01C66B0 14TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 174 168 172 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 190
Mixed 122
SusWrite 173
123% 167 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 3.1
546% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 26.8
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 18 4 144 27" 1280 720 ACR0406 Acer XB270H A
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $846
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback