HP ProBook 650 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 650 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1993
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 20:17
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 138
52% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 372
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 385 409 385 315 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 234
Write 340
Mixed 301
SusWrite 324
68% 300 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 29.4
100% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 166
147% 218 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-401.A00LF Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 41 60 0" 1280 720
Typical ProBook 650 G1 Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback